‘More analysis’ does not necessarily mean a longer answer. It often means the answer states a rule and a result but does not explain how the facts support that result. Diagnose the missing reasoning before adding paragraphs.
When to use this guide: Use this guide to decode a grader's comment and choose the right repair. The conclusory-analysis guide demonstrates a sentence-level repair; the factual-analysis guide helps choose relevant details.
Identify the unsupported step
Find the rule, the relevant fact, and the conclusion in the criticized passage. Ask which connection is missing. You may need to explain why a fact satisfies a requirement, why a contrary fact is less persuasive, or why an authority is distinguishable.
Add a reason rather than a narrative
Restating more facts can lengthen the answer without solving the problem. Add the explanation those facts require. A useful revision makes the reader understand why the detail changes the legal assessment instead of merely reminding the reader that the detail exists.
Check whether the issue itself was incomplete
Sometimes the problem is a missing requirement or defense rather than shallow treatment of a recognized issue. Compare the feedback with the question and current materials. If the comment is unclear, ask the grader which passage or requirement needs development.
Worked example
Three possible meanings of the same comment
The phrase ‘more analysis’ appears on three fictional feedback forms. In Answer A, a conclusion lacks any fact-based explanation. In Answer B, a material qualification is omitted. In Answer C, contrary evidence is listed but never weighed.
Starting approach
Add another paragraph retelling the facts to all three answers.
A stronger approach
For A, explain how the decisive fact affects the requirement. For B, verify the omitted qualification and apply it. For C, explain why the competing facts support different inferences and which is stronger. Ask the grader for a passage-specific example when the intended repair remains unclear.
Why the change matters
The comment is a starting point for diagnosis, not a universal instruction to increase length. Compare the question, the criticized passage, and the applicable framework before revising. A bounded repair is easier to evaluate than adding general discussion to the whole response.
Common mistake: Do not assume every request for analysis identifies the same underlying problem.
Original teaching example created for this guide. Illustrations are not released exam questions, actual student submissions, or official grading standards.
Use the published graded-answer examples to see the relationship between a response and its comments. If a recurring problem remains unclear, personal tutoring can help you discuss a specific passage and choose the next practice task.
Try this in your next session
Rewrite one criticized paragraph with no more than three added sentences. Each added sentence must connect a fact to a requirement or resolve a competing inference.
Your practice checklist
Put the method into practice.
Practice real past bar exam essays and performance tests online, then use individual attorney feedback to plan your next answer. Available test types depend on your package.
These are practice suggestions, not official grading criteria or a prediction of exam results. Follow the instructions and timing for your selected question and current exam administration.